America's Army Forums
http://archive2.forum.americasarmy.com/

AA3 is a better game than AA:PG
http://archive2.forum.americasarmy.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=10695
Page 1 of 2

Author:  SiicKxShoTz [ Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:  AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

I really wish AA3 would have been released on a polished note, and that it received the kind of attention AA:PG is receiving.

Author:  iColts [ Thu Nov 28, 2013 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

wha bud

Author:  SiicKxShoTz [ Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

iColts wrote:
wha bud

Gesundheit?

Author:  commiek [ Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

meth

not even once.

Author:  SiicKxShoTz [ Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

commiek wrote:
meth

not even once.

Past experience of yours?

Author:  iColts [ Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

SiicKxShoTz wrote:
I really wish AA3 would have been released on a polished note, and that it received the kind of attention AA:PG is receiving.



Yes and battlefield 1942 has better graphics than battlefield 4. For sure.

Author:  uni-sol [ Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

SiicKxShoTz wrote:
I really wish AA3 would have been released on a polished note, and that it received the kind of attention AA:PG is receiving.


+1

i used to often wonder what the 'coming soon' secondary MOS were gonna be.. 3 tiers of them too?! and the rail attachments that we never got to see.

since the game has been and virtually gone (to devs and aacm) is it possible to let us in on the plans and ideas the devs/army had for the game? i would love to know what we missed out on. for example, what happened to destroyable objectives we did in the training, but were never in game?

there was also talk of combat medic roles and engineers? what other squad roles were planned? and furthermore.. what would those roles have bought to the game? how would they have fit into AA3?

Author:  SiicKxShoTz [ Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

AA3's realism made it fun to play. The graphics and the mechanics really made the game unique and set apart from other shooters. Gun jams, leaning around corners, good sounds. The game is just a higher quality game than AA:PG, and it had so much more potential.

I have no idea why the heck they would release it in such a terrible, broken state. People say the game sucked in its entirety solely because it was released in a terrible state. Once it was patched into playability, it was my personal favorite shooter to play.

AA:PG feels like a cartoon remake of the debut movie AA3.

Author:  uni-sol [ Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

AA3.. like reading a one of a kind book, getting real into it and then finding 30 pages have been ripped out of the end :(

an untold story.

Author:  frankof [ Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AA3 is a better game than AA:PG

AA3 "failed" for all the wrong reasons, the concept was really ahead of everything you seen in games and i dont think you'll see it for a long time.
When it worked it was great, when it didnt work, not so great.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/